<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Redowl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redowl.ca/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redowl.ca</link>
	<description>Jonathan Addleman, harpsichordist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Clavichord by Peter Chellew</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=171&#038;cpage=1#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chellew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=171#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>Have just begun to explore your web-page. Fascinating, much of interest to me. I came primarily to hear your Attaingnant, very nice, but became distracted by the Desencios, Allegro non troppo! Very interesting writing and superb playing. I shall return. Cheers, Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have just begun to explore your web-page. Fascinating, much of interest to me. I came primarily to hear your Attaingnant, very nice, but became distracted by the Desencios, Allegro non troppo! Very interesting writing and superb playing. I shall return. Cheers, Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on D&#8217;Anglebert Allemande by Redowl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; D&#8217;Anglebert Prelude</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=101&#038;cpage=1#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>Redowl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; D&#8217;Anglebert Prelude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=101#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>[...] a followup to last week&#8217;s allemande, I&#8217;ve recorded the prelude for the same suite. I adore unmeasured preludes! If ever there was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a followup to last week&#8217;s allemande, I&#8217;ve recorded the prelude for the same suite. I adore unmeasured preludes! If ever there was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting anew? by Jon-o</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon-o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>RSS! Yes, but that&#039;s cheating.

I AM A CHEATER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSS! Yes, but that&#8217;s cheating.</p>
<p>I AM A CHEATER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting anew? by snotoro</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>snotoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>rss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting anew? by Jon-o</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon-o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>With magical skills! It&#039;s easy to miss when you don&#039;t check it because it *NEVER GETS UPDATED*. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With magical skills! It&#8217;s easy to miss when you don&#8217;t check it because it *NEVER GETS UPDATED*. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting anew? by snotoro</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91&#038;cpage=1#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>snotoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=91#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>whoa. how did i miss this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoa. how did i miss this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on politics by Jon-o</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=81&#038;cpage=1#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon-o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=81#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>That last bit would definitely be best... I guess we&#039;ll just have to work hard to ignore politics until January! Have some cake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last bit would definitely be best&#8230; I guess we&#8217;ll just have to work hard to ignore politics until January! Have some cake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on politics by Josef</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=81&#038;cpage=1#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=81#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s just no way that Harper can restore confidence in himself or in his party &quot;

Well, no, but he &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; continue to feed paranoia about socialists, separatists, and Dion through massive PR spending until the court of public opinion gets loud enough that the Coalition doesn&#039;t have the support of even its own constituents. More likely, he&#039;s just hoping for another election, as you said.

From the news I&#039;ve seen, my impression that it&#039;s not possible for anyone but the PM to call an emergency session, unfortunately. 

To tell you the truth, I&#039;ve been pretty unsure about my own feelings on this. Yes, I want to see Harper fall as soon as possible, and I&#039;ve got no problem with Dion being PM for a while, or with requiring the support of the Bloc. In fact, I think it&#039;s pretty telling that after so much of the &quot;Anything but Conservative&quot; message during the election, the government could actually end up being Everyone but Conservative. I do have some fears that the coalition would be even more unstable than the Conservative minority, and would be wrecked by internal power struggles n&#039; such. But I guess my hope overall was that the Coalition would take power, or at least get everyone riled up enough that even the Conservatives have a reason to take the idea of electoral reform seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s just no way that Harper can restore confidence in himself or in his party &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, no, but he <i>can</i> continue to feed paranoia about socialists, separatists, and Dion through massive PR spending until the court of public opinion gets loud enough that the Coalition doesn&#8217;t have the support of even its own constituents. More likely, he&#8217;s just hoping for another election, as you said.</p>
<p>From the news I&#8217;ve seen, my impression that it&#8217;s not possible for anyone but the PM to call an emergency session, unfortunately. </p>
<p>To tell you the truth, I&#8217;ve been pretty unsure about my own feelings on this. Yes, I want to see Harper fall as soon as possible, and I&#8217;ve got no problem with Dion being PM for a while, or with requiring the support of the Bloc. In fact, I think it&#8217;s pretty telling that after so much of the &#8220;Anything but Conservative&#8221; message during the election, the government could actually end up being Everyone but Conservative. I do have some fears that the coalition would be even more unstable than the Conservative minority, and would be wrecked by internal power struggles n&#8217; such. But I guess my hope overall was that the Coalition would take power, or at least get everyone riled up enough that even the Conservatives have a reason to take the idea of electoral reform seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New copyright bill by Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=62#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Egads what a horrible bunch of tripe this bill constitutes.

If one buys a legal copy of a CD/DVD or computer software they should have every right to make a backup copy for fair use. One big scratch and the media is rendered useless. 

This seems very facist even. Same problem in the US. The big corporate interests (MPAA, RIAA) own most of the politicians so the one who pays the piper names the tune!

And it doesn&#039;t help that most people are apathetic, misinformed, etc.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egads what a horrible bunch of tripe this bill constitutes.</p>
<p>If one buys a legal copy of a CD/DVD or computer software they should have every right to make a backup copy for fair use. One big scratch and the media is rendered useless. </p>
<p>This seems very facist even. Same problem in the US. The big corporate interests (MPAA, RIAA) own most of the politicians so the one who pays the piper names the tune!</p>
<p>And it doesn&#8217;t help that most people are apathetic, misinformed, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ttuner .1.1 by Jon-o</title>
		<link>http://www.redowl.ca/?p=55&#038;cpage=1#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon-o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redowl.ca/?p=55#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>First of all, there&#039;s nothing about this program that limits it to tuning harpsichords - I&#039;ve used it as a tool for organs and viola da gambas as well as a general purpose tool for calculating and hearing differences between different temperaments.

Secondly, it&#039;s not really a temperament I use, but it&#039;s easy to put in new temperament files, so why not include it? I can easily add in any other temperaments, so I don&#039;t see any reason to restrict it to only the handful of most useful ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, there&#8217;s nothing about this program that limits it to tuning harpsichords &#8211; I&#8217;ve used it as a tool for organs and viola da gambas as well as a general purpose tool for calculating and hearing differences between different temperaments.</p>
<p>Secondly, it&#8217;s not really a temperament I use, but it&#8217;s easy to put in new temperament files, so why not include it? I can easily add in any other temperaments, so I don&#8217;t see any reason to restrict it to only the handful of most useful ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
